<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nets Wake Up? Ponder Whether Hulu Hurts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/nets-wake-up-ponder-whether-hulu-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/nets-wake-up-ponder-whether-hulu-hurts/</link>
	<description>We Support One Union for All Performers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:16:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/nets-wake-up-ponder-whether-hulu-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-7101</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1327#comment-7101</guid>
		<description>Hulu isn&#039;t any more free to the consumer than broadcast TV has been for the last 50+ years.  The watcher still has to watch commercials to see the content.

--

Ed. Response - That&#039;s a good point, with one quibble. Commercials on broadcast are played to an audience of millions and get a good CPM. A commercial played to an audience of one produces revenue that&#039;s miniscule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hulu isn&#8217;t any more free to the consumer than broadcast TV has been for the last 50+ years.  The watcher still has to watch commercials to see the content.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Ed. Response &#8211; That&#8217;s a good point, with one quibble. Commercials on broadcast are played to an audience of millions and get a good CPM. A commercial played to an audience of one produces revenue that&#8217;s miniscule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Creque</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/nets-wake-up-ponder-whether-hulu-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-7100</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Creque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1327#comment-7100</guid>
		<description>This is called &quot;channel conflict.&quot;  It&#039;s roughly the same problem as when a consumer brand decides to sell through discount and warehouse stores that compete with its traditional base of retailers.

I think the nets&#039; big mistake is to promote Hulu as a way to rot your brain faster, i.e., a viable way to watch more TV that&#039;s supposedly equivalent to the &quot;TV set&quot; in the living room.  They ought to promote it as the backstop to your TV: a way to catch up on episodes you missed or to access great shows from the past, albeit in an admittedly inferior viewing experience.  That way, they establish Hulu as a separate distribution channel that provides convenience but not viewing quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is called &#8220;channel conflict.&#8221;  It&#8217;s roughly the same problem as when a consumer brand decides to sell through discount and warehouse stores that compete with its traditional base of retailers.</p>
<p>I think the nets&#8217; big mistake is to promote Hulu as a way to rot your brain faster, i.e., a viable way to watch more TV that&#8217;s supposedly equivalent to the &#8220;TV set&#8221; in the living room.  They ought to promote it as the backstop to your TV: a way to catch up on episodes you missed or to access great shows from the past, albeit in an admittedly inferior viewing experience.  That way, they establish Hulu as a separate distribution channel that provides convenience but not viewing quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william charlton</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/nets-wake-up-ponder-whether-hulu-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator>william charlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1327#comment-7098</guid>
		<description>all the more reason we have to stay flexible and on top of(ie do our own research, look at their books, etc) a medium that is in a state of flux and hasn&#039;t found the way to make money yet. Interestingly enough, I know a lot of 16 year olds that have bought entire seasons of &quot;Chuck&quot; off of iTunes, which, if this contract were now in place, would provide for a residual percentage that is twice that of DVD&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all the more reason we have to stay flexible and on top of(ie do our own research, look at their books, etc) a medium that is in a state of flux and hasn&#8217;t found the way to make money yet. Interestingly enough, I know a lot of 16 year olds that have bought entire seasons of &#8220;Chuck&#8221; off of iTunes, which, if this contract were now in place, would provide for a residual percentage that is twice that of DVD&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Skipper</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/nets-wake-up-ponder-whether-hulu-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-7096</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Skipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1327#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>One myth you will hear is that if they don&#039;t put if out for free, then someone will.  I&#039;ve noticed that the NFL doesn&#039;t seem to have those issues.  They control their product and vigorously defend their rights worldwide.  The producers ought to be able to do the same if that is their desire.  In the final analysis, I think it&#039;s their only option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One myth you will hear is that if they don&#8217;t put if out for free, then someone will.  I&#8217;ve noticed that the NFL doesn&#8217;t seem to have those issues.  They control their product and vigorously defend their rights worldwide.  The producers ought to be able to do the same if that is their desire.  In the final analysis, I think it&#8217;s their only option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Giggles</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/nets-wake-up-ponder-whether-hulu-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-7095</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Giggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1327#comment-7095</guid>
		<description>So, maybe they have been reading this blog....many of us for months have been pointing out this very fact, along with others, why this is not the financial monster some woud have you believe.

It&#039;s not &#039;Now&#039; Media....!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, maybe they have been reading this blog&#8230;.many of us for months have been pointing out this very fact, along with others, why this is not the financial monster some woud have you believe.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not &#8216;Now&#8217; Media&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
