<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember, it&#8217;s Variety&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/</link>
	<description>Observing the Screen Actors Guild and AFTRA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:16:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vested</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8603</link>
		<dc:creator>vested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8603</guid>
		<description>Oh, trust me  - he (Chuck Sloan) continues to hover and influence, just out of shooting range.
He&#039;s also paid (or has been in the recent past) by the SAG Foundation to advise actors on tax issues.

V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, trust me  &#8211; he (Chuck Sloan) continues to hover and influence, just out of shooting range.<br />
He&#8217;s also paid (or has been in the recent past) by the SAG Foundation to advise actors on tax issues.</p>
<p>V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voiceguy</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8601</link>
		<dc:creator>Voiceguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8601</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to Chuck Sloan, anyway?

VG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to Chuck Sloan, anyway?</p>
<p>VG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vested</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8599</link>
		<dc:creator>vested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 19:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8599</guid>
		<description>I  think her idea of a slick position would a seat on the NB of AFTRA,  and at the same time she&#039;s the puppetmaster at SAG. In her book, that&#039;s &#039;step one.&#039; 
She&#039;s already said of AFTRA, &quot;I don&#039;t know how it&#039;s run, but I want to run it.&quot; 
So let&#039;s play crystal ball for a minute ... she&#039;ll begin to move her angry, contempt-filled self up through the ranks of AFTRA, with her eye on the national Pres seat. Not to HOLD the seat, but to CONTROL it. 
It&#039;s just so ... Chuck Sloan-esque, isn&#039;t it? He&#039;s the guy who put Daniels in as pres of SAG, and who said, &quot;I could be the God of SAG if I wanted to ...&quot;
Imagine, if you will, one puppetmaster controlling two presidents - SAG &amp; AFTRA. 
I doubt it will happen, but who actually ever believed SAG would be in the mess it&#039;s in right now?
The above scenario puts such a spin on the &quot;man behind the curtain&quot; routine that if you think about it too long it can make your head explode.

V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  think her idea of a slick position would a seat on the NB of AFTRA,  and at the same time she&#8217;s the puppetmaster at SAG. In her book, that&#8217;s &#8217;step one.&#8217;<br />
She&#8217;s already said of AFTRA, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know how it&#8217;s run, but I want to run it.&#8221;<br />
So let&#8217;s play crystal ball for a minute &#8230; she&#8217;ll begin to move her angry, contempt-filled self up through the ranks of AFTRA, with her eye on the national Pres seat. Not to HOLD the seat, but to CONTROL it.<br />
It&#8217;s just so &#8230; Chuck Sloan-esque, isn&#8217;t it? He&#8217;s the guy who put Daniels in as pres of SAG, and who said, &#8220;I could be the God of SAG if I wanted to &#8230;&#8221;<br />
Imagine, if you will, one puppetmaster controlling two presidents &#8211; SAG &amp; AFTRA.<br />
I doubt it will happen, but who actually ever believed SAG would be in the mess it&#8217;s in right now?<br />
The above scenario puts such a spin on the &#8220;man behind the curtain&#8221; routine that if you think about it too long it can make your head explode.</p>
<p>V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred W</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8596</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 19:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8596</guid>
		<description>Do you think AMJ would be happy continuing to pull the strings, considering what a great success she&#039;s had to this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think AMJ would be happy continuing to pull the strings, considering what a great success she&#8217;s had to this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vested</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8592</link>
		<dc:creator>vested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 18:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8592</guid>
		<description>Watch them pull a Bill Daniels-type out of their hat at the last minute.

Beware of a last minute, MF-supported candidate who plays as a MODERATE.

That&#039;s the candidate who, once elected, will be run by the puppetmaster(AMJ).

We&#039;ve seen that B-class horror flick already ... and we know how it ends.

V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch them pull a Bill Daniels-type out of their hat at the last minute.</p>
<p>Beware of a last minute, MF-supported candidate who plays as a MODERATE.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the candidate who, once elected, will be run by the puppetmaster(AMJ).</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen that B-class horror flick already &#8230; and we know how it ends.</p>
<p>V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred W</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8585</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8585</guid>
		<description>Cromwell out-Presidents Sheen 4-2.5.  

Cromwell played Johnson, Bush I, and two fictional ones, including one on &quot;West Wing.&quot;

Sheen played JFK, plus he had &quot;West Wing&quot; and gets half credit for the role of Greg Stillson in &quot;The Dead Zone,&quot; who would have been elected if Christopher Walken hadn&#039;t shot at him.

I gotta think AMJ is hearing footsteps at the moment.  My guess is that she runs anyhow and ensures SAG has another plurality president to succeed Alan &quot;47% is a bigger mandate than 53%&quot; Rosenberg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cromwell out-Presidents Sheen 4-2.5.  </p>
<p>Cromwell played Johnson, Bush I, and two fictional ones, including one on &#8220;West Wing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sheen played JFK, plus he had &#8220;West Wing&#8221; and gets half credit for the role of Greg Stillson in &#8220;The Dead Zone,&#8221; who would have been elected if Christopher Walken hadn&#8217;t shot at him.</p>
<p>I gotta think AMJ is hearing footsteps at the moment.  My guess is that she runs anyhow and ensures SAG has another plurality president to succeed Alan &#8220;47% is a bigger mandate than 53%&#8221; Rosenberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vested</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>vested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>Sadly, many hardliners view moderation as weakness, and an inability to hold fast to a convicted stance.

They are wrong.

There is nothing weak about a thoughtful, purposeful, and thouroughly educated approach to negotiations.

Doc, you&#039;re right: that also defines &quot;levelheadedness.&quot;

For SAG to remain solvent and relevant, level heads MUST prevail.

In the end, when all that&#039;s left is sawdust and glitter, and we&#039;re all moving through it with push brooms, maybe we&#039;ll know more about what drives such destructive forces as MF. 
But by then we may no longer care.

V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, many hardliners view moderation as weakness, and an inability to hold fast to a convicted stance.</p>
<p>They are wrong.</p>
<p>There is nothing weak about a thoughtful, purposeful, and thouroughly educated approach to negotiations.</p>
<p>Doc, you&#8217;re right: that also defines &#8220;levelheadedness.&#8221;</p>
<p>For SAG to remain solvent and relevant, level heads MUST prevail.</p>
<p>In the end, when all that&#8217;s left is sawdust and glitter, and we&#8217;re all moving through it with push brooms, maybe we&#8217;ll know more about what drives such destructive forces as MF.<br />
But by then we may no longer care.</p>
<p>V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Giggles</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8547</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Giggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8547</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think the term &quot;moderate&quot; is wrong - it should be &quot;level headed&quot;. The Non MF - UFS/USAN/NY/RBD...whatever, but the Non-MF are members who think first calmly, look at the options, think long term and act....unlike ... well, you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think the term &#8220;moderate&#8221; is wrong &#8211; it should be &#8220;level headed&#8221;. The Non MF &#8211; UFS/USAN/NY/RBD&#8230;whatever, but the Non-MF are members who think first calmly, look at the options, think long term and act&#8230;.unlike &#8230; well, you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Hassman</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8542</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hassman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8542</guid>
		<description>Now there&#039;s the invigorated, adaptable youth the guild needs to run smoothly in these trying times... [/end snark font/].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now there&#8217;s the invigorated, adaptable youth the guild needs to run smoothly in these trying times&#8230; [/end snark font/].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voiceguy</title>
		<link>http://www.sagwatch.net/2009/05/remember-its-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-8538</link>
		<dc:creator>Voiceguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagwatch.net/?p=1719#comment-8538</guid>
		<description>Stinkki thinks Martin Sheen will be running against Jamie Cromwell for SAG Prez.

VG

--

Admin. Comment - That&#039;s going to ruin AMJ&#039;s whole day. But then, it could ruin Sheen&#039;s, too. The guy can&#039;t read a contract?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stinkki thinks Martin Sheen will be running against Jamie Cromwell for SAG Prez.</p>
<p>VG</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Admin. Comment &#8211; That&#8217;s going to ruin AMJ&#8217;s whole day. But then, it could ruin Sheen&#8217;s, too. The guy can&#8217;t read a contract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
