Pre Blog Posts

A note: the PDF here is our best efforts to reconstruct our old posts from before we went to the blog format. Unfortunately, due to server crashes, there’s some material that’s garbled, and some that’s lost. Bit by bit we’re trying to put back together what we had… but we’re afraid some of the writing we like best is gone forever. Oh, well…

2 Comments

  1. james mc auley says:

    Here are some facts that the slight majority of our National Board has neglected to tell us.

    Main changes if this contract is voted up;

    1. Loss of Residuals –
    At the day-player scale rate, every actor will lose
    $2,000.00 for each day they work. They will also, lose
    14.8% for pension & health($296.00) It will be replaced
    with $22.77($3.33 for pension and health) for 6 months of
    streaming on the net. Although this will be bad for each
    actor on an individual level, can you imagine how fast our
    pension and health fund will dry up? They are going to show
    all re-runs on the internet. No more re-runs on TV. There
    is a lot of room to negotiate between $2,000.00 and $22.77
    and many of us feel that they can go back to the table and
    do a better job!

    2. Non-Union work in Original Made for New Media Productions -
    Unless the budget is $25,000.00/minute or more(average thus
    far is $2500.00), the producers will use 32 pages of our
    contract full of exclusions and requirements to decide who
    is a “Qualified Performer”. And then, they can produce with
    only that one SAG cast member and the rest of the cast can
    be all Non-Union yet they will want us to call it a SAG
    Production! If voted up, this trend can easily spread to TV
    and Film.

    3. Clip Consent –
    Since 1960, we have had Clip Consent. If a producer wants
    to use one of your clips in a movie, tv show, documentary,
    on the internet, etc., they must first get your permission,
    and then negotiate a price for the use. If this contract is
    voted up, the producers can use your clips ‘intact’ in any
    project they choose(what if the project involves subject
    matter that you are opposed to?). With the current state of
    Computer Generated Images, they can also take you out of
    context and have you doing things you would never have
    consented to do in the first place. They will be able to do
    all of this without your consent, and without paying you.

    4. Product Integration –
    We all know about Product Placement, but if this contract
    passes, we will all become commercial spokespeople for the
    particular products in the tv show or film. If the product
    is Coke, and you are already a Pepsi spokesperson, make a
    choice. You will lose either your Pepsi sponsorship, or that
    roll. You will not be payed for the endorsement of the
    product. You will not receive residuals when they use the
    Clip Consent Clause and take your product endorsement out
    of the project and use it separately as a commercial. And,
    finally, the pool of regular separate commercials necessary
    to sell products will become smaller because many of us will
    be doing commercials and promoting products as part of our
    artistic expression in a given scene in any given project.

    5. Force Majeure -
    Since 1937, this is what protects you once you have been
    booked and you spend many hours learning your part and
    getting into character, and also turning down other
    lucrative work because you are already booked. If they
    book you, and production is halted do to a strike, or an
    act of God, or any other reason, they must pay you five
    weeks at half your rate. As of right now, the producers
    owe SAG Actors at least $60,000,000.00 and as much as
    $400,000,000.00 for last years strike. If this contract
    is voted up, the producers will have to pay only
    $20,000,000.00 total, and, in the future, each member will have
    to bargain individually for Force Majeure protection. The
    obvious strength in numbers of the collective bargaining
    of SAG will no longer provide Force Majeure protection.
    If you are not an ‘A’ list actor, good luck!

    Why are we being asked to give away protections we’ve had for years, only to fight or strike to get them back in two years? This is nonsense. I can almost understand waiting two years to fight for new things that we don’t yet have. But, when they include giving away protections which were hard fought for, and giving away the residuals of those who fought for them, I have to VOTE NO!

    Please share this with any SAG mebers you know

    Thank You

    james

    http://www.myspace.com/sagstars

    Frank ‘Lumpy’ Bank and Ken ‘Eddie Haskell’ Osmond
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Rvx6THsmKA

    Rob Schneider
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwluMUKLXdo

    Ed Harris
    http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/video-ed-harris-explains-vote-no-position/

    Martin Sheen
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8_U0GSXPu0

    Rhonda De Felice
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLPhjeYvicg

    Rico Bueno
    Pt1 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jp8BUvZvw0
    Pt2 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMBhLES9Uhg
    Pt3 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6uTmfE6VUw

    Ed Asner
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcgZ4mfSZ4Y

    Charles Shaughnessy, Rance Howard, Nancy Sinatra, Anne Ramsay and Esai Morales
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNJZhwFAQQ

  2. Dwayne Charles Hart says:

    I have been reading the numerous blogs on this site and a few others concerning the SAG crisis. Many BTL techs, artists and support people, feel that those people of MEMBERSHIP first and the SAG leadership fail to recognize the environment they have created.

    Many BTL and support people are in serious financial straights partially because of the economy in general but the WGA strike and the SAG stagnate negotiatiions on their contracts. They have abandoned their support for SAG and have no sympathy.

    I have talked to many who have lost their homes, can’t pay their utilities and standard of living has disintegrated into poverty because of this stalemate. It’s disgusting to read the comments from people who support a no vote against the contract. They seem to be comfortable and believe they can withstand a strike for any length of time. They have blinders on not wanting to see the fallout from their inept negotiations, absurd leadership and selfish reasoning that is destroying SAG but the rest of the industry as whole.

    SAG has the best contract of any of the unions, even in its present form and the proposed one from AMPTP. An authorization to strike and subsequent execution thereof, many predict SAG will be memory by the end of the year.

    As days go by, more and more non SAG people are angered by this situtaion and will withdraw their support for SAG should any strike authorization be fronted.

    SAG members should now realize that they need someone who is a professional CEO, one who is NOT an actor but a businessman. It is evident that every SAG president has been more emotional than business savvy which over the last 30 years that union keeps regressing and surrenders its basic philosphy and mission.

    A many have said, TAKE THE BEATING. Vote YES for this contract. Create a dialogue with AFTRA and merge, that’s your only way of surving

Leave a Reply